Those pearls were said of Taiwan origins.
So I think next time I will order mesona instead.
Looking at the news on IFA 2012, and my continued usage of Windows 8 - I am more and more convinced that Windows 8 (and RT) are meant for tablet.
I like the Metro Modern UI/display - it is informative, it is like the gadgets of Android, gives you updated information, customized the way you want.
The usage gesture is somewhat unique to its own - such as pulling out the charm bar, closing the apps, pulling the loaded apps (think of it like how you switch tab in Google Chrome on iPad)
The sad thing, which I have been criticizing since the day 1 I use Windows 8, is that these 'gesture' will be applicable to Windows 8 for desktop, you can't use finger but the mouse to do those gesture.
To a certain extend, I thought it's Microsoft's subliminal strategy to push people to use tablet.
I will give a quick prediction - I would be glad if I'm right:
1) Windows 8 RT will be big.
2) It will convince even more people to switch to tablet.(and hence, further decline of PC market)
3) It will push the competition of Android OS & iOS further.
4) Microsoft Surface will hit 3 millions sales target this year.
5) 60% of people will dislike Windows 8 (note: Windows 8 & RT are different), or will install the Start button via third party website.
Two major factors for its make-or-break (for its tablet flavour):
i) How Windows Store will be as usable as Google's Play Store & Apple's ITunes? (these stores give major income and most importantly, the reason why people are still stick to the OSes)
ii) Battery life - if it is worse than Android's, then good luck and goodbye.
My first reaction was LOL.
Whether the cream is effective or not - the advertisement was effective, almost reaching 700k viewers in just 10 days.
Call us pessimistic, while I thought the short film is really futuristic and it might be how the future is..
But I thought the film would look better if the person looks very fat (a la Wall-E) because they don't need to move anywhere to get all the info he/she needs.
I also thought the film would look realistic if the person is living in a smaller space - because the they don't need space for toys and books.
My sis said she doesn't want this kind of future, because human will stop speaking and meeting each other physically.
(But next morning, when I walked past her bedroom - the first thing she did when she woke up was watching movie on iPad)
The thing about the local film, Tanda Putera, is that - I find it unnecessary.
1) It features the director's view on 513 incident, which, the topic itself is not even allowed to be taught in details in primary or secondary school. Hence, the public never had a fair view on the incident - what gives the director to have the fair view on the incident?
Moreover, in the trailer, it clearly showed that the production team did not do enough research - some of the banners were written in simplified Chinese, whereby it was only introduced into Malaysia in the 70s.
2) Then comes about the timing - the movie will screen some time in November, which is just months away from General Election.
The title itself had already suggested that it is a movie dedicated to Tun Razak, who is the late father of current Prime Minister - Najib Razak.
So there's no doubt that this movie intends to remind people about Tun Razak's contribution to Malaysia.
This point is also strongly related to point#1, which, the movie is somewhat intended to demonize the Chinese descendant in Malaysia - as the cause of the riot.
To give yourself a much holistic view on 513 incident, I strongly recommend you to read the article on Wikipedia, and also an interview with Tunku Abdul Rahman - the ex-Prime Minister who was forced to resign after the 513 incident.
After reading both articles, you can somehow tell that there was indeed some conspiracies, and most importantly, both Malay and Chinese were both held responsible for causing the riot.
So, this movie at this timing, one may say that, somewhat it has intention to be in conjunction with General Election - to tell the citizens that the current government knows best.
3) There are better story to tell for a movie.
For example, how about a film about Tunku Abdul Rahman? There are so many stories to tell, from him being the Chief Minister of Malaya, to become the Prime Minister of Malaya, and his effort in getting Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore to join Malaysia, while witnessing Singapore departed from Malaysia.
That would be a much better topic to remind Malaysians how our leaders fought for independence, to appreciate and to respect.